A few months back, we bought a new Canon inkjet printer. We’d been fairly unhappy with the old one, but the final straw was when it ran out of ink in all five cartridges simultaneously. We added up the cost of replacing them and recoiled in horror. Then we realized that by throwing in another few euros, we could just get a new printer.
Enter the shiny new Canon MG6150. It did everything we needed, for about two months. Then it stopped printing. The error message informed us that the main black ink cartridge was empty, and there would be no printing whatsoever until we’d bought a new one.
Disgusted, I started doing research. And the first thing I learned was that our printer was lying to us.
Ink sales are a huge moneymaker, not just for printer manufacturers but also for third-party companies specializing in compatible refills. The ink itself is cheap to manufacture, and yet, according to PC World:
An average black-ink cartridge contains 8 milliliters of ink and costs about $10 which translates into a cost of $1.25 per milliliter (or more horrifyingly, $1250 per liter).
(Note: the quoted article is three years old; the cost has gone up since then. And here in Europe, with the VAT, it’s even more expensive.)
If you’re a manufacturing company making great profits on a cheap product with a huge markup, what’s your next step? Selling even more of that product. How do you do that? 1) Tell your customers that they need it, even when they don’t, and 2) prevent them from using their printers until they go out and get it. A total halt to productivity makes for great incentive.
Most of us are pretty sure that our ink cartridges aren’t really empty when the printer says they are. We suspect we’re being scammed but can’t prove it. PC World set out to find that proof with a little old-fashioned empirical testing.
PC World Test Center results show that models from Canon, Epson, and Kodak reported ink cartridges as being empty when in some cases the tanks had 40 percent of their black ink remaining.
The quantity of unused ink ranged from about 8 percent in an Epson-brand cartridge to a whopping 45 percent in an aftermarket cartridge for a Canon printer.
So, now we know we’re being scammed. And those of us with an environmental bent are also fairly pissed off about the waste. But what can we do, when the printer locks up due to the “out of ink” message?
We can reset the chip.
Ink cartridge chips are the latest tool used by printer manufacturers to make sure that customers can’t override the low ink warning. The tiny electronic chips monitor ink usage, or, in many cases, simply count pages. Once the predefined threshold of a chip is passed, it will lock up the printer. The warning cannot be overridden.
But it turns out that there is a whole community of irritated printer owners who do not like being scammed. They have started up companies catering to other irritated printer owners, and one of the things they do is take ink cartridges and reverse engineer the chips. Then they build inexpensive “chip resetters” that exist for one purpose only: to reset the chip’s page count or ink level usage to zero.
I ordered a chip resetter from Octoinkjet, and raced to the printer the moment it arrived. It took me about twenty seconds to remove the inkjet cartridge, slip it into the chip resetter, pull it back out and return it to the printer. Immediately, the printer registered a full ink level.
So far, we’ve printed more than 60 pages of dense text and images with our “empty” ink cartridge. I’m watching carefully, ready to pull the cartridge the moment the text starts looking light (because you don’t want the ink to run out or nasty things happen to the print head), but so far it’s quite happy. When it really does run low, I’m ready to refill it myself, having bought those materials as well. To heck with being victimized!
My chip resetter cost €23. A new large black ink cartridge from our local Staples costs €16. In another usage or two, the resetter will have paid for itself — and both my magenta and cyan cartridges are already saying they’re low.
But I know they’re lying.
UPDATE 30 SEPT:
Martin Smallridge, the owner of Octoinkjet (where I bought my chip resetter and refilling supplies), has weighed in with a more nuanced explanation of what the chips do and why you don’t want to keep printing until your ink runs out. I may have brushed over that part too lightly — when I wrote “nasty things happen to the print head,” I probably should have added “and then your printer becomes a bibelot.” Which is why I’m watching mine so closely. I’d have refilled the black cartridge right away, but since I am replacing it with a previous model cartridge (which has a transparent section making it much easier to refill, as opposed to the opaque plastic of the current model), I want to use up as much ink as I can without endangering the printer.
For more on this, please check out Martin’s comment below. I will just add that I believe a manufacturer’s claim that the extra ink in an “empty” cartridge is really for the protection of the printer when that extra ink amounts to 8%, as in the Epson example in PC World’s tests. When the extra amounts to 40%, then I’m not buying the excuse. That’s not protection, that’s a scam.
But it is definitely better to be safe than sorry, so unless you’re refilling, use a chip resetter with extreme caution.

Don’t know if you understand Spanish, but in case you do, try and watch this amazing documentary on “Planned obsolescence”. It features a printer as well.
It’s chilling!
That IS chilling. I did not know about the cartel that limited the lifespan of light bulbs. I did, however, know about the number one cause of “breakage” among inkjet printers. The same company from which I bought my chip resetter and refill inks also sells kits for managing waste ink. Apparently, Epson printers are the worst for squirting out a lot of waste ink.
These are scary times we’re living in…
Chilling indeed, syrin. Thank you for sharing this fabulous documental. And they are saying that “grow” is the solution for the crisis. We change our ways or we will be “kaput”
About ink and printers. They could even offer free printers to attract the client because the money comes from the ink. This is their recognized strategy, and they want nobody messing with their business.
As example, here is what says Lexmark (http://company-seek.ceo-recruiters.com/lexmark-LXK.htm)
“STRATEGY
Lexmark’s strategy is based on a business model of building an installed base of printers and multifunction ***products that generate demand for its related supplies and services***. Management believes that Lexmark has unique strengths
related to this business model, which have allowed it to grow faster than themarket over the past several years and achieve above average profitability in the office and home printing output market.”
Well i have to say.. i’m not surprised. In my university-career in economics, we got taught about this but with cars. Car-producers let some of their cars brake down/rust through in order to see which pieces last too long (stay well long beyond others) and made them less good. All in all (at that time) a car wasn’t supposed to last longer than 10 years. And by now it probably has gone down again. Humanity isn’t prepared to be sustainable.
In any case it was fun to try to understand all the languages.. German, English, French and Spanish.. It’s great!
In any case it was fun to try to understand all the languages.. German, English, French and Spanish.. It’s great!….
Try is the effective word ..
I’ve been confronted lately with an increasing number of my “pupils” (the not-so-young persons I’ve been trying to get better acquainted with their “computing gear”, as I call it) calling me for help about their printer that wouldn’t work anymore …. After trying any trick(that is many) I could think of (including manufacturer’s cartridges change, of course..), I had to give up. One of them told me that his old(5 years) printer’s software monitor has done “something like an update” a few days before…
Personally, I’ve never been able to notice or recreate the failure, but I wouldn’t be too much surprised if the update had been the deathblow to an obviously too old machine (was printing like a young one, though…).
I did succeed though, in my attempt to make an old HP start printing again, by cleaning as much spilt ink from the inside of it’s “cleaning compartment” (spilt ink reservoir and sponge) !
And I could get an old(2005) Cannon back on track by thoroughly(at leas…t) cleaning the easily-removable printing head.
That makes about 10% success, and only with former models
Ahh, for your information : it seems that some browser(..) toolbars are messing with the printers, too ….
If you deactivate them, printing becomes Ok again.
I knew it!!! Printers are evil, or at least manufactured by evil companies. For those who haven’t seen it already (though I know you have, OE
) see http://theoatmeal.com/comics/printers
I agree with Inge that humanity isn’t prepared to be sustainable. It really pisses me off that machines of today are built to break down within a few years of use. A few decades ago, stuff was built to last. One would have thought that better technology would equal better longevity for the things it’s used in, but oh no.
And the worst part is that we are being encouraged by nearly every single company to buy new things when the old ones quit working, just like you guys did with your printer. Getting something repaired is often outrageously expensive, and people who make a living out of mending some specific device are getting fewer and farther between every year…
Perhaps I should add that while we did buy a new printer, we didn’t throw the old one away. We found it a new home with my wife’s ex. And now we’re talking him into buying a chip resetter for it…and if he’ll share the cost, I’ll refill his cartridges for him. Let’s see how long we can keep these two printers out of the “recycled electronics” pile.
Excellent!
Where did you get the refill ink?
Same place I bought the chip resetter: Octoinkjet in the UK. It’s highly recommended on irritated printer owner forums, and my own experience so far has been good. The owner answered my questions quickly and thoroughly, and the shipping rate was very low. (A major consideration down here, where even businesses in France will often charge 25 euros to ship a 10-euro product.)
It’s going to be true for computers, too. Where I’ve been working (computer maintenance and refurbishment for further sale at low prices), the Boss(es) (retired from IBM for the most part) think there are very few years left before shutting up shop.
this just makes my blood boil. My 17yr old car has passed it’s MOT, with the assistance of my local mechanic. He told me a lady had come in to have a front headlight bulb replaced on her new car… it used to be a simple job that you did at home, now the bulb costs £32 and the WHOLE FRONT BUMPER has to be removed, thus more cost Car manufacturers are just as conniving crooks as the printer folks. OE would you have any objection to me passing on this post to family and friends ?
Of course not. It’s out there in the public domain, pass it around to as many folks as you like!
Just been pointed to this article by another customer and thought I’d best just provide a few amendments as some of the information gained so far may be a little misleading.
The first thing to note is that the printer uses two mechanisms to identify whether the cartridge is “empty”.
[ Note: This is educated guesswork as obviously Canon will not be confirmed/denying anything directly. ]
The first is a prism based in the bottom of the cartridge under the “front” spongeless part. This beams the little red LED up into the cartridge and if occluded detects that ink is present. This is part of what’s used to detect refilling. It was the primary tool for detecting ink levels in the pre-chip models (eg: iP4000) and its function has been hotly debated since the chip has reappeared so it may no longer hold any function other than to detect refilling.
The second mechanism is the chip itself which uses an algorithm in tandem with the printer to determine whether the cartridge should be empty. It’s also probably used to guesstimate the contents of the sponge part of the cartridge and call a halt before the sponge is sucking fumes.
Now the thing here is that the chip “MAY” take its cue to start a countdown of sorts based on the prism “reading”. In essence, saying “Ok, the spongeless part is now empty, we should only have Xml of ink left in the sponge” and allowing for a safe level that errs on the side of caution.
There’s two ways to look at this… The first that manufacturer is out to rip off the customer, and the second that they’re trying to protect the printer itself. You’ll make your own minds up on which is most applicable but there’s definitely an element of the latter involved as the ink itself cools the nozzles and stops the printer overheating. If the ink runs out then the nozzles could overheat and ultimately fry the printhead.
To summarise, I would apply caution to the idea of simply resetting and continuing to use your “empty” cartridges as you may find a much bigger problem develops as a result… ie: a large Canon printer sized doorstop.
Instead, I would look very seriously at the opportunities present in refilling your cartridges. The obvious benefits are that you get a minimal price per print and you also don’t chuck out a ton of additional plastic into a landfill.
There are downsides however, including a learning curve, potential pitfalls and the initial expense of purchasing the necessary refilling tools, inks ….and hair dye to cope with the rapid greying that may result
Please note this is definitely not intended as a sales pitch… I thought it prudent to provide a fuller picture so folks can make an informed decision and avoid making a rather painful mistake without at least having some additional information as to the potential pitfalls.
Hope that helps and happy to expand, clarify (or just shush!) if requested…
this is why i have never kept or used a printer even when they were thrown in with the computer…
i just take a stick or a cd down to staples and print it for next to nothing..
i’ve printed maybe 10 pages in the last 11 years, and most of those were sent to friends whose printers had failed…
it would have to be of earth shattering importance for me to waste the money on printing something for myself…